Why are billionaires just people and you might be their problem?

Image source:: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6603399/Bill-Gates-63-photographed-waiting-line-local-Seattle-burger-shop.html

The world is 323% in dept. Who is this money owed to? Mars?

The global bubble in the making starts with people who believe in their own personal bubbles that aren’t empirically backed. So they make unwise financial decisions. The difference between rich people and poor people, is that the first usually don’t have a bubble around their heads but because of the second ones, have to live in a bubble (isolation).

To simplify, some people earn more than they spend and others spend more than they earn. Because the second ones are in majority, sovereign states need to increase their debt perennially. By owing to the private sector, the financial markets wash away the state’s power. This is how the sovereign state has diminished capacity to serve everybody and focuses on its creditors. So how come has the quality of life increased despite the inflation and the fall of the state we are observing?

Because of innovation, today we have intercontinental flights available for the masses, smartphones and AI, fidget spinners, etc. And only because of entrepreneurial innovation we can get many products relatively inexpensively compared to only 10 years ago. The average human in the USA in 2020 lives a better live than the Rockefellers 100 years before him. This is the power of innovation. However, as life gets too comfortable many tend to work less and expect more. This is one important reason for the rise of the global credit bubble. The tradeoff as mentioned is again inflation that doesn’t treat people equally.

If innovation was faster than inflation the relative inequality wouldn’t be felt so much as the quality of life would still increase. And this is exactly what didn't happen in the past decades. The relative quality of life of average people compared to wealthy people has fallen.

Hare are some numbers.

The value of 1 000 000 USD in 2020 was only $146 528 in 1970. There were almost 400 000 patents granted in 2019 52% of which were foreign, and 67 960 patents granted in 1970 in the USA 26% of which were foreign.

The 2019/1970 ratios are as follows.

• Patent progress ratio in the US: 5.75
• Inflation increase ratio in the US: 6.82

We see also that innovation increases in the total amount of patents approved. However, unlike inflation, innovation is not always cumulative. What’s the society's value in patenting round iPhone corners? (Yes, Apple patented round corners). I predict not only that innovation will stall even further behind inflation, but that it will become less impactful and more meaningless in the forthcoming decades.

Thus, we have two main factors that impact welfare. Innovation and inflation and both work wonders for the wealthy but only innovation works for the masses.

With regards to inflation, billionaires can hedge their risks with creative financial instruments or fixed assets. They can also move wealth internationally and use tax and inflation optimisation to protect their net worth. Ordinary people cannot. While it was weird for somebody to be a billionaire in the 70s today we have Jeff Bezos worth a whooping $200 billion dollars and many others who are worth north of $100 billion dollars. They have asymmetrical benefits from both innovation and inflation.

It’s needless to say that innovation, from life extension to luxury items will become available for the wealthy first. Billionaires thus benefit from innovation not only economically for their businesses, but also personally. I predict that only billionaires who die forcefully will not get to live by 100. Good for the wealthy!

These people are very rich, but their wealth is made far larger than it is by the fact it is in a bubble with many fewer valuable things offered as alternatives. So, when value is scarce everything valuable appears bigger. For this reason alone, most UHNWI don’t buy their net worth at face value. They see also the liability coming with the net worth not just the upside of it and some feel, if not explicitly understand, the historical context of their inflated relative wealth.

And here’s the catch ‘ordinary people’ don’t get. Billionaires wouldn’t be what they are if they were deluding themselves that they deserve something they don’t make themselves. They are highly-intelligent people with lots of power but with an honest self-talk. To become and REMAIN billionaires they had to be totally down-to-Earth, have zero-ego, and play the game as it was meant to be played but at no instance to forget, that it's just a game they intend to win by all means.

Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/bloomberg-irene-subway-2011-8

​​Then, others, envious and bitter people for wanting more than they deserve, either curse them or declared them superstars to fill their own vanity. If they pass by them on the street they wouldn't believe they are real! Bill Gates thinks it is because of the hat sometimes. It's not most of the time. They just don't believe it's him! In their eyes he is their 'god' who is somewhere high and unreachable to them only because they are in love with the gold and money, not with playfulness. They idolise them instead of treating them fairly.

​To stay down to Earth, normal, and kind, billionaires have historically had to hide. It is not really a problem of billionaires as much as of the average person blowing their own bubble of delusions and the global economy with it. The wealthy cannot even use the subway without bodyguards or being photographed, not because they don't want to use it.

Don't blow a bubble. A personal, or a global one. Treat billionaires equally and yourself honestly.

And if you have to learn from somebody, learn from those who win the game & focus on yours.